The 10 Critical Pitfalls in Modern Contract Mangement

 In Resources, Whitepapers

By Tim Cummins, CEO IACCM

How much would your business be worth if it had no contracts? How confident would you be about your trading partners meeting their commitments if they were not documented?

The purposes of a contract are largely to secure economic value and to operate as an instrument of business management and control. Research data shows that in many cases, the contracts we produce and the way they are managed are not ‘fit for purpose’. The result is substantial value erosion.

Here are two statistics that may surprise you:

  • In a 2012 survey of its members, the International Association for Contract & Commercial Management (IACCM) identified that the average cost of poor contracting is 9.2% of a firm’s annual revenue. For large, capital project industries such as oil and gas it is even higher – almost 15%.
  • A 2013 study by the European Commission that explored performance of ‘mega-projects’ (those involving expenditure of 500 million euros or more) discovered that 65% fail or severely under-perform, with an average cost overrun of 80%.

When we first unearthed this data, we found it hard to believe. So our efforts then focused on validation. We did this by working with a range of large companies to undertake contract audits and to explore the specific sources of value erosion or loss.

And we discovered that the statistics are not wrong. Even more important, we found that much of the failure could be eliminated through improved contract and commercial practices and process. The losses that were uncovered are rarely attributable to litigation (which occurs on average in only 0.007% of contracts). Typically, they are also not connected to the areas where we spend most time negotiating (liabilities, indemnities, and intellectual property). They result instead from poor quality and fragmented approaches in the overall contracting process – using the wrong forms of agreement, poorly defined scope, weakness in negotiated change, lack of clarity in roles, responsibilities or authorities. Through a series of workshops, we identified ten issues – or ‘pitfalls’ – that frequently lead to poor performance in contracts.

To continue reading enter your email address to download a complete copy.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About the Author

In his role as CEO of IACCM, Tim works with leading corporations, public and academic bodies, supporting executive awareness and understanding of the role that procurement, contracting and relationship management play in the 21st century business performance and public policy.

Prior to IACCM, Tim’s business career included executive roles at IBM and a period on the Chairman’s staff, leading studies on the impacts of globalisation and the re-engineering of IBM’s global contracting processes. His earlier career involved the banking automotive and aerospace industries, initially in Corporate Finance and later in commercial and business development. He led negotiations up to $1.5 billion in value and his work has taken him to over 40 countries.

Tim’s writing is extensively published and he acted in an advisory capacity to government bodies in countries that include the US, UK, Australia, Canada and Japan, as well as regular briefings to senior managers at many of the world’s largest companies.

Contact Us

Please type your query in the message box below, and we'll get back to you shortly.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt

Start typing and press Enter to search